Clean air?

From today, we are smoke-free.  Yay!

Smoke is just nasty: I suffer from it at home when the neighbours smoke, in the street when it’s too crowded or narrow to get past the smoker, at the railway station when three or four smokers spaced out along the platform can leave nowhere free of it, or in the bus shelter where it only takes one to drive me out into the rain.

But wait a minute!  The smoking ban doesn’t affect any of those smokers.  They’re all in their own homes or outdoors.  It might even make it worse, if smokers who would otherwise be indoors are instead fouling the street.

Is there anywhere it will help?  Smokers have been a major blight on my life, from the misery of the school bus, to the three of my jobs that they’ve made a misery (one involved smokers in the same open-plan office, the other two involved it drifting from the smokers’ own).  A pub or restaurant meal can be ruined by them.  And I haven’t been to the cinema in a quarter century, after a very nasty experience in my teens.

But that’s really a battle that’s already won, in the UK at least.  Some pubs and restaurants are still foul, but others are smoke-free and perfectly pleasant.  The station or bus stop may still be grotty, but where it really matters, on the bus or train itself, isn’t.  Places of entertainment are free of it.  Whereas in my youth, avoiding smokers meant severely cramping the social life, nowadays there are ample choices to accommodate both smokers and decent people.

On the other hand, I really would like to get rid of some of the other pollution that afflicts our air.  It was back in the ’80s – when smoking was still a very serious problem in many places – that I first concluded that motor vehicle emissions were actually a worse problem than tobacco smoke.  In the intervening 20 years, that’s just got worse while smokers have retreated.  It seems absurd to ban the minor problem of tobacco smoke while leaving drivers free to pollute on a global scale.  And don’t get me started on bonfires and wood smoke, which in afflicted places are an order of magnitude worse than any of the other nuisances.

Now, if they’d ban it from the home, that would be much more useful.  If I could sue the neighbours every time they make my flat stink, I’d …. lead a life blighted by petty conflict.  Yeah, great.  Smokers rights are not something I’m about to make a stand for, but this ban seems to lack a sense of proportion, as well as being near-useless.

Posted on June 30, 2007, in health, rants, smoking ban, uk. Bookmark the permalink. 5 Comments.

  1. My understanding is that the ban does cover open railway station platforms (and, I guess, bus shelters are classed as enclosed public spaces too), and our regional train outfit has put up lots of notices to this effect to fulfil their statutory duty. See also

    In practice, I doubt smokers will take a lot of notice of them and I, for one, will not be challenging a smoker on a remote railway platform in the bog end of nowhere when he or she decides to light up.

    Of course I could avoid this particular curse by getting into my never-smoked-in car and inflicting all those nasty fumes on everyone (although, apart from CO2, car exhausts are a damned sight cleaner now than they’ve ever been before)…sometimes you just can’t win!

  2. With car fumes, bad as they are, catalytic converters remove the worst pollutants (except for Diesel particulates which are carcinogenic) and the rest dissipate into the wider atmosphere. The trouble with smoking conducted inside enclosed pubic spaces is that the smoke is not dipsersed, and becomes more and more concentrated the longer more people smoke indoors. Apart from it tasting like sour bile, the acrid smell of tobacco smoke is just a straight turn-off.

  3. fifthdecade: of course smoke is foul. My point is it’s already become so much easier to avoid in public places.

    I said I detest smoke creeping into my home, which it’s done rather a lot in recent weeks, possibly due to weather conditions pushing it this way (and since I work from home, that means I get to sit in a smoky office, which this law supposedly prevents).

    But my home is also on a rather narrow road, where cars have to slow right down, wait, and manoeuvre just to pass each other. Cars doing that (and parking) bring a richer cocktail of very nasty fumes into the home than anything from the smokers. Volatile hydrocarbons are worse than diesel particulates.

    And the film of black grime on every windowsill a couple of weeks from cleaning it bears witness to something nasty.

  4. Update from the railway platform in the bog end of nowhere: no smokers observed on the platform in either direction today. Usually there are at least one or two. Maybe I’ve just been lucky, the Brits ain’t usually THAT law abiding.

  1. Pingback: Clearing the air | niq's soapbox

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: